Skip to content
Module 06 of 1255 min readIntermediate

Private equity and venture capital

Fund structure (GP/LP, carry, J-curve). VC's seed-Series A-B-C ladder. PE's buyout-and-improve playbook. The economics of the asset class.

50%

Listen along

Read “Private equity and venture capital” aloud

Plays in your browser using on-device text-to-speech — nothing leaves the page.

Learning objectives

By the end of this module, you should be able to:

  • 01Describe the GP / LP fund structure and how carry works
  • 02Distinguish venture capital from private equity buyout funds
  • 03Identify the value-creation playbook each follows

Private equity and venture capital have become major sources of capital — globally over $4 trillion AUM. The asset class buys, develops, and exits companies on time horizons of 3-10 years. The fund structure is the same; the strategies are very different.

Fund structure: GP, LP, and carry

Every PE / VC fund has the same structure:

  • Limited Partners (LPs): the investors. Pension funds, sovereign wealth, family offices, endowments, insurance companies. They commit capital but have no day-to-day control. LPs cap their commitment at a fixed amount — they have 'limited liability'.
  • General Partner (GP): the fund manager. Makes investment decisions, manages the portfolio, distributes capital. Owns the fund management company. Has 'unlimited liability' (theoretical — in practice the GP entity is itself an LLC).
  • Fund: the legal vehicle that pools LP commitments. Typically a Cayman LP or Delaware LP for international funds; Mauritius for some Africa-focused funds.

Economics: 2 and 20

text
Standard PE/VC compensation:
Annual management fee: 2% of committed capital (sometimes invested capital)
Carried interest (carry): 20% of profits above an 8% hurdle
Example: $500m fund, returns 2x net to LPs over 7 years
Fees over fund life: $500m × 2% × 7 = $70m
Profit to LPs (gross): $500m × (2x − 1) = $500m
Hurdle: $500m × 8% × 7 = $280m... GP gets carry on profits above hurdle
Profit above hurdle: $220m
GP carry: $220m × 20% = $44m
GP total comp: $70m + $44m = $114m on a $500m fund.
LP net IRR: ~18% after fees.
The 2-and-20 model is famously rich for successful GPs and aligned with LP
returns. Variations: some funds use 1.5-and-15; some use higher hurdles
(10-12%); some catch-up provisions before LPs get any profit.
The compensation model that has made PE/VC general partners extraordinarily wealthy when funds succeed.

VC vs PE buyout — different strategies

  • Venture capital: backs young, often pre-revenue companies. Takes minority stakes (typically 10-30%). Invests in stages — seed, Series A, B, C — each round at higher valuation. Expects most investments to fail; relies on the 1-in-10 that becomes a 100x. Time horizon: 7-10 years per investment.
  • PE buyout: acquires established, profitable companies (often via LBO using significant debt). Takes majority or 100% stake. Holds for 3-7 years. Improves the business operationally (cost reduction, growth, professionalisation). Exits via sale to strategic, IPO, or another PE fund. Expects most investments to succeed at moderate returns (2-3x).

The J-curve

PE/VC fund returns follow a J-shape: in early years, investments are made (capital deployed) but no exits yet. Fees are charged. Reported returns are negative for the first 3-5 years of a fund. Then exits start; returns climb. By year 7-10, the fund returns capital plus profits to LPs. A 'good' fund returns 1.5-2.5x net to LPs (15-25% net IRR). A 'great' fund returns 3x+ (30%+ IRR).

The value-creation playbook

PE buyouts create value via four levers: (1) leverage — debt funding lets equity earn higher returns on the same operational improvement; (2) operational improvements — better procurement, lean operations, professionalised management; (3) multiple expansion — selling at higher EBITDA multiple than buying (luck, timing, sector tailwinds, smaller-to-larger M&A); (4) growth — expand market share, geography, product. The best PE firms execute all four; the bad ones rely only on leverage and hope.

African PE/VC landscape

African PE/VC has grown from negligible in 2000 to ~$10bn annual commitments by 2024. Africa-focused funds: Helios, Africa Capital Alliance, AfricInvest, TLcom Capital, Partech Africa, Novastar Ventures. The constraints: smaller deal pipeline at scale, exit liquidity (few IPO routes, M&A markets less developed), currency risk for USD-denominated funds. The opportunities: lower entry valuations, fast-growing markets, less competition than developed markets. Africa-focused funds have generally underperformed developed-market peers on absolute returns but with lower correlation, making them useful portfolio diversifiers for LPs.

Exercise

A Kenyan family business with KES 3bn revenue, KES 500m EBITDA, no debt, is approached by an Africa-focused PE fund offering to buy 60% for KES 3bn. The CEO can stay; the PE fund will take board control and bring 'operational support'. Walk through the considerations.

Key takeaways

  • GP = fund manager; LPs = investors. GP takes 2% annual management fee + 20% carry on profits above 8% hurdle.
  • VC backs early-stage growth; PE buys established companies and improves them.
  • Both deliver returns through value creation + exit (IPO, sale, recap).
Loading progress…
LeadAfrikPublic Economics Hub