Skip to content
2000Sveriges Riksbank Prize · Behavioural, empirical, institutional

James Heckman and Daniel McFadden

Citation: For their development of theory and methods for analyzing selective samples (Heckman) and the theory and methods for analyzing discrete choice (McFadden).

The key idea

Heckman: selection bias has structure and can be corrected. McFadden: the multinomial logit and conditional logit make discrete-choice data (yes/no, which-brand) econometrically tractable.

The explanation

Heckman's two-step estimator (1979) corrects for sample-selection bias — e.g., observing wages only for people who chose to work. McFadden's logit framework (1974) gave consistent estimators for choice probabilities and won by transforming travel-demand analysis. Together they made microeconometrics rigorous.

Why Africa should care

Heckman correction is essential for any African study of wages, education returns, or labour-market participation — observations are non-random because of who chooses (or is allowed) to work. McFadden's discrete-choice framework underlies every mobile-money adoption study, voter-behaviour analysis, and brand-choice market research conducted in African contexts.

How to use it

Before running an OLS regression on a non-random sample (e.g., wages of women who worked), implement Heckman correction. The selection equation is often as informative as the outcome equation.

Canonical works

  • James J. Heckman (1979) "Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error" Econometrica
  • Daniel L. McFadden (1974) "Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior" Frontiers in Econometrics (Zarembka, ed.)
Official Nobel Foundation page ↗