Skip to content
1974Sveriges Riksbank Prize · Foundations

Gunnar Myrdal and Friedrich Hayek

Citation: For their pioneering work in the theory of money and economic fluctuations and for their penetrating analysis of the interdependence of economic, social and institutional phenomena.

The key idea

Two utterly opposite visions: Myrdal — economies are bound up with social institutions and demand activist policy; Hayek — markets coordinate dispersed knowledge in ways no planner can replicate.

The explanation

Myrdal's Asian Drama (1968) argued that Western models of development could not be transplanted to poorer countries without addressing institutions, inequality, and 'soft states'. Hayek's The Use of Knowledge in Society (1945) argued that prices aggregate dispersed local knowledge in ways central planning fundamentally cannot — and warned that interventionist policy carries authoritarian risks.

Why Africa should care

The Myrdal-Hayek tension is alive in every African policy debate. Myrdal's 'soft state' diagnosis — governments that pass laws but cannot enforce them — still describes much of public administration south of the Sahara. Hayek's price-as-information argument is the strongest case against fuel subsidies, exchange-rate pegs, and food-price controls, all of which destroy the signal.

How to use it

When a market is failing locally, ask first whether it's failing because of broken institutions (Myrdal) or because price signals are being suppressed (Hayek). The fix differs entirely.

Canonical works

  • Gunnar Myrdal (1968) "Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations" Pantheon
  • Friedrich A. Hayek (1945) "The Use of Knowledge in Society" American Economic Review
  • Friedrich A. Hayek (1944) "The Road to Serfdom" Routledge
Official Nobel Foundation page ↗