Skip to content
Module 09 of 1360 min readMixed

Credit risk modelling — PD, LGD, EAD, Basel

Probability of default, loss given default, exposure at default, expected loss. The mathematics regulators built Basel III around — and that every bank lives by.

69%

Listen along

Read “Credit risk modelling — PD, LGD, EAD, Basel” aloud

Plays in your browser using on-device text-to-speech — nothing leaves the page.

Learning objectives

By the end of this module, you should be able to:

  • 01Define PD, LGD, EAD, and Expected Loss
  • 02Compute Expected Loss for a sample loan
  • 03Recognise the role of Basel III in standardising credit risk measurement

Modern bank credit risk runs on a small set of equations whose elegance hides the institutional weight behind them. The core equation is so simple it fits on a single line of text, yet it is the calculation a credit risk committee, a regulatory capital officer, and a loan pricing model all use, every working day, on every exposure on the bank's balance sheet. The Basel framework codifies the equation into regulatory capital rules that govern roughly USD 200 trillion of global banking assets. The implementation is hard enough that whole departments are dedicated to it; the fundamentals are simple enough that every credit analyst should be able to carry them.

The core equation

text
Expected Loss = PD × LGD × EAD

Variable glossary — every input explained

  • Expected Loss (EL) — the average loss the lender expects to incur over the next period (usually one year) on this exposure, expressed in the currency of the exposure. Not what the bank actually loses on this loan in any given year — that's a draw from a distribution — but the long-run statistical average. The bank prices this average into the interest rate it charges.
  • PD — probability of default. The probability that the borrower defaults at any point in the next year, expressed as a decimal between 0 and 1. A 3% PD means three defaults per hundred borrowers of this credit quality in an average year. Sources: statistical models fit on historical defaults, agency rating-implied default tables, or market-implied PD backed out of bond or CDS spreads.
  • LGD — loss given default. The fraction of exposure that the lender ultimately loses, after recoveries from collateral, guarantees, and restructuring negotiations. Expressed as a decimal. A 40% LGD means the lender recovers 60% of what was outstanding at default. Driven primarily by seniority and collateral: senior secured 15-40% LGD, senior unsecured 40-60%, subordinated 60-80%, unsecured retail 70-90%.
  • EAD — exposure at default. The amount actually outstanding when default occurs, in currency. For an amortising term loan, EAD is the remaining principal at the default date. For a revolving credit line, EAD typically exceeds the current drawn balance because distressed borrowers draw down available headroom before defaulting — captured by a credit conversion factor (CCF) applied to the undrawn portion.

Why each variable matters for what the bank does

PD is what credit analysts spend most of their time estimating, because it captures the underwriting decision — does this borrower look like a 1% PD or a 5% PD? LGD is set largely at structuring time through seniority, collateral, and covenants — the credit officer's job is to drive LGD down by demanding security. EAD is operationally managed through limit setting, monitoring, and freezing draws when the relationship sours. Each variable corresponds to a distinct lever the bank can pull: PD to underwriting, LGD to structuring, EAD to monitoring.

A worked example with every variable explicit

text
Loan profile:
Borrower: Kenyan mid-cap manufacturer, rated B+ (S&P-equivalent)
Loan size (EAD): KES 10,000,000 — fully drawn term loan, no undrawn headroom
Collateral: Building valued KES 12,000,000 at origination
Recovery: Liquidation typically recovers 60% of building's market value
after costs, time, and forced-sale discount
Step 1 — PD: B+ rating → historical 1-year PD ≈ 3%
PD = 0.03
Step 2 — LGD: Recovery from collateral = 12,000,000 × 0.60 = 7,200,000
Exposure = 10,000,000
Loss = 10,000,000 − 7,200,000 = 2,800,000
LGD = 2,800,000 / 10,000,000 = 0.28 (28%)
Step 3 — EAD: Term loan, no undrawn portion.
EAD = 10,000,000
Step 4 — Expected Loss:
EL = 0.03 × 0.28 × 10,000,000 = KES 84,000 per year
Interpretation: in expectation the bank loses KES 84,000 a year on this
loan. To break even on credit losses, the loan must earn at least 84 bp
in spread above its funding cost. To clear the bank's full pricing hurdle
it must also cover opex and the capital cost — see the RAROC walkthrough
in Module 10 [[leverage-haircuts-secured]].

Probability of Default — three sources

PD is the variable most subject to analyst judgement and the one most often disputed in credit-risk committees. Three independent sources are used in combination:

  • Statistical models fitted to historical default data. Logistic regression or machine-learning models trained on years of defaulted vs non-defaulted loans, with financial-statement variables (leverage, interest coverage, working-capital ratios) and behavioural variables (account-conduct history, late payments, bureau data) as inputs.
  • Credit ratings. Each agency rating maps to a historical 1-year and lifetime PD: AAA <0.1%, BBB roughly 0.3-0.5%, BB roughly 2-3%, B roughly 5-8%, CCC roughly 25-30%. Banks calibrate internal grades to one of these scales.
  • Market-implied measures. CDS spreads and bond spreads back out a market-implied PD assuming a recovery rate (typically 40% by convention). Markets see information that bank analysts miss; the gap between bank-rated PD and market-implied PD is itself a signal worth investigating.

Banks distinguish 'through-the-cycle' PDs (long-run averages across an economic cycle, used for regulatory capital under Basel) from 'point-in-time' PDs (today's conditional probability, used for IFRS 9 expected credit loss provisions). The same borrower can have a 2% through-the-cycle PD and a 5% point-in-time PD if conditions are weakening. Both numbers are real; they answer different questions.

Loss Given Default — driven by seniority and collateral

LGD is the fraction of exposure lost in default. It is shaped primarily at deal-structuring time and is the lever credit officers pull when negotiating term sheets. Three settings drive most of the variation across loans:

  • Seniority: where the loan sits in the capital-structure waterfall. Senior secured paid first, then senior unsecured, then subordinated. Empirical LGDs by tier are tracked publicly by Moody's, S&P, and Fitch and have remained roughly stable for decades.
  • Collateral: pledged assets that the lender can liquidate against the outstanding exposure in default. The Kenyan SACCO model's robustness comes from heavy collateralisation — share collateral plus guarantor cover often drives LGD below 20%.
  • Bankruptcy regime: jurisdictions with strong creditor protection (US Chapter 11, English law) deliver higher recoveries than weak regimes. Kenya's Insolvency Act 2015 modernised the regime but enforcement timelines remain long, which depresses recoveries.

Exposure at Default and credit conversion factors

For a fully-drawn term loan, EAD equals the outstanding principal at the default date. For revolving facilities — credit cards, commercial lines of credit, working-capital facilities — the problem is harder: borrowers under stress draw down available headroom before missing payments. A KES 10m line with KES 6m drawn could become KES 9m drawn just before the default. Basel and bank internal models address this by applying a Credit Conversion Factor (CCF) to the undrawn portion:

text
EAD = Drawn balance + CCF × Undrawn balance
where:
Drawn balance = what the borrower has actually borrowed today
Undrawn balance = the remaining limit the borrower could still draw
CCF = the credit conversion factor, in decimal form
A regulatory or internally-estimated number
reflecting how much of the undrawn headroom
typically gets drawn before default.
Basel standardised CCFs: 0% for unconditionally
cancellable retail lines (cards), 20-50% for
short-term trade and corporate lines,
50-100% for committed term-out facilities.
Example: KES 10m line, KES 6m drawn. CCF = 50%.
EAD = 6,000,000 + 0.50 × 4,000,000 = KES 8,000,000

Expected Loss vs Unexpected Loss

Expected Loss is what the bank prices into the interest rate — covering the average year of credit losses. Unexpected Loss is the variation around that average — the bad years when defaults cluster — and what regulatory capital exists to absorb. Basel III's risk-weighted capital requirement is essentially: hold enough equity to cover credit losses up to the 99.9th percentile of the loss distribution. The Tier 1 ratio you see in bank disclosures is the cushion against unexpected loss, not expected loss. A bank reporting a 14% CET1 ratio is reporting that it has enough equity to absorb credit and market losses far worse than the long-run average without becoming insolvent.

Basel III in plain terms

  • Banks must hold capital proportional to risk-weighted assets (RWA). High-risk loans count for more than low-risk loans.
  • Risk weights are either standardised (regulator-set, by asset type) or internal-ratings-based (the bank's own models, subject to regulatory approval).
  • Minimum Common Equity Tier 1 ratio (CET1 / RWA): 4.5%, with conservation buffer + countercyclical buffer pushing the effective minimum to 7-10%.
  • Leverage ratio (Tier 1 / Total Assets): 3% minimum, regardless of risk weight.
  • Liquidity Coverage Ratio: must hold enough high-quality liquid assets to survive 30-day stress.

IFRS 9 — expected credit loss accounting

Since 2018, IFRS 9 requires banks to recognise expected credit losses on the books at origination, not just when defaults occur. Loans are classified Stage 1 (no significant deterioration — 12-month expected loss provisioned), Stage 2 (significant deterioration — lifetime expected loss), or Stage 3 (defaulted — lifetime expected loss with stricter measurement). This is why Kenyan banks' loan-loss provisions are far more volatile post-2018 than before.

Exercise

A bank has a KES 500m commercial loan, secured against property valued at KES 700m. Historical PD for this rating bucket is 2%. Property liquidation typically recovers 60% of market value (after costs, time, distress). Compute: PD, LGD, EAD, Expected Loss, and the minimum spread the bank should price above its cost of funds.

Key takeaways

  • Expected Loss = PD × LGD × EAD.
  • Probability of Default, Loss Given Default, Exposure at Default — three numbers every regulated lender estimates for every exposure.
  • Basel III turned these from heuristics into regulator-required calculations.
Loading progress…
LeadAfrikPublic Economics Hub