Skip to content
Module 08 of 1350 min readMixed

Sovereign credit and Eurobonds

Country ratings, sovereign default risk, Eurobonds, IMF programmes, Kenya's debt trajectory — and what default actually looks like when a state, not a company, can't pay.

62%

Listen along

Read “Sovereign credit and Eurobonds” aloud

Plays in your browser using on-device text-to-speech — nothing leaves the page.

Learning objectives

By the end of this module, you should be able to:

  • 01Explain what sovereign credit risk is and why it differs from corporate credit
  • 02Identify Kenya's current credit profile in context
  • 03Describe how IMF programmes work as a sovereign credit backstop

Sovereign credit is its own discipline. A country can't be put into bankruptcy by its creditors. There's no legal mechanism that forces a state to pay. Sovereign default is therefore as much a political event as a financial one — and the analytical framework is different from corporate credit.

What sovereign creditworthiness depends on

  • Debt-to-GDP ratio: how large is the debt relative to economic output? Above 90% becomes concerning for emerging markets; advanced economies sustain higher levels because they borrow in their own currency.
  • Debt-service-to-revenue: how much of tax receipts goes to paying debt interest? Kenya's was 35% in 2024 — historically very high.
  • External vs domestic debt mix: external debt (FX-denominated) is harder to default on because you can't print the foreign currency.
  • Reserves: how much FX does the central bank hold relative to short-term obligations and import cover?
  • Tax base and political capacity to raise revenue when needed.
  • Currency arrangement (fixed vs floating, dollarised, regional bloc).

Kenya's credit profile in context

Kenya entered 2025 with public debt at ~70% of GDP — over Sh 11 trillion. Debt service consumed ~35% of revenue. Eurobond maturities clustered in 2024 and 2027 created refinancing pressure. The country negotiated with the IMF for an Extended Fund Facility programme. Credit ratings remain in the B/B3 band — speculative grade, but not at imminent default risk.

This is a typical late-cycle EM sovereign profile: not insolvent, but with limited room to absorb shocks. The Eurobond yields (10%+ in 2024) reflect this risk. Sovereign credit analysts watch debt-service-to-revenue more closely than debt-to-GDP because revenue can decline (recession, commodity shock) faster than debt.

Willingness vs ability to pay

An advanced-economy sovereign that can print its own currency can ALWAYS pay nominal local-currency debt (it might inflate it away, but it can pay). What matters is willingness — political tolerance for the inflation cost. An EM sovereign borrowing in FX is constrained by ability — it needs hard currency. Most defaults of recent decades (Argentina 2001 and 2014, Greece 2012, Sri Lanka 2022) were ability-driven on FX debt. Argentina's repeated defaults are partly willingness — domestic political pressure to favour citizens over creditors.

Eurobonds and external debt

Eurobonds — bonds issued in a currency other than the issuer's domestic currency, typically USD or EUR — are how most African sovereigns access international capital markets. Kenya has issued Eurobonds since 2014. Pros: longer tenors than domestic markets allow, large-ticket access. Cons: FX risk for the sovereign, exposure to global rate cycles, and the credit-rating constraint.

IMF programmes

When a sovereign faces a balance-of-payments crisis, the IMF can provide emergency financing in exchange for policy conditionality — fiscal consolidation, currency reform, structural changes. IMF programmes are typically 3-year arrangements with quarterly reviews. They unlock additional financing from World Bank, AfDB, and bilateral lenders. They also signal credibility to private creditors. Kenya's IMF programmes (multiple in recent decades) have been the backstop that prevented harder crises.

The political cost of IMF programmes

IMF conditionality is politically explosive in developing countries because it imposes austerity (subsidy removal, tax increases, public-sector wage restraint) on populations that didn't take the loans. Kenyan protests in 2024 around tax increases were directly traceable to IMF programme conditions. Sovereign analysts who ignore this political dimension misread credit risk — debt that requires politically unsustainable austerity has higher default risk regardless of what the spreadsheet says.

Sovereign default — what it actually looks like

Recent sovereign defaults provide the playbook: Argentina (2001, 2014, 2020 — repeat offender), Greece (2012, the largest sovereign default in history at $138bn), Sri Lanka (2022), Zambia (2020), Ghana (2022), Ethiopia (2024). Default usually means: missed interest payment → distressed exchange offer (haircuts of 30–60% common) → renegotiation with bondholder groups → restructured bonds with longer tenors and lower coupons. Litigation by 'holdout' creditors who refuse the exchange can drag on for decades — Argentina's 2014 default litigation lasted 15 years.

Exercise

Pull up Kenya's current 10-year USD Eurobond yield (publicly available). Compare it to (a) a US 10-year Treasury yield; (b) South Africa's 10-year USD Eurobond yield. Decompose the spread. What does the comparison tell you about how the market views Kenya vs South Africa as credits?

Key takeaways

  • Sovereign default isn't bankruptcy — there's no court to enforce against a state.
  • Default risk depends on willingness AND ability to pay; emerging markets often face willingness pressure first.
  • Kenya's debt situation in 2026 is a real-time case study in EM sovereign credit dynamics.
Loading progress…
LeadAfrikPublic Economics Hub